Twitter
Twitter

Twitter takes legal action 4 unknown individuals Data Scraping

What To Know

  • The complaint states that the four entities, referred to solely by their IP addresses, engaged in the unauthorized scraping of Twitter user data, thereby violating the platform’s terms of service.
  • The company asserts that the actions of these individuals resulted in unjust enrichment at the expense of X Corp.
  • The court determined that scraping publicly accessible data does not constitute a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which is often utilized in lawsuits related to data scraping.
  • asserts that the defendants’ actions have caused significant damage, and as a result, Twitter is now seeking $1 million in damages to compensate for the impact caused by these actions.

Elon Musk’s X Corp. has initiated a lawsuit against four unidentified individuals, alleging their involvement in the unauthorized scraping of user data from Twitter. CNBC first reported the lawsuit, which was filed in a court in Dallas County, Texas, on July 6th. The lawsuit aims to recover damages exceeding $1 million.

The complaint states that the four entities, referred to solely by their IP addresses, engaged in the unauthorized scraping of Twitter user data, thereby violating the platform’s terms of service. Described as “flooding” Twitter’s sign-up page with automated requests, these actions allegedly placed a burden on the company’s servers and disrupted the experience of users. The lawsuit highlights the detrimental effects caused by these activities and seeks legal redress for the damages incurred.

X Corp. has stated that it has been unable to determine the identities of all four individuals involved. The company asserts that the actions of these individuals resulted in unjust enrichment at the expense of X Corp. It is claimed that the defendants derived profits from their unauthorized scraping of Twitter data. X Corp. highlights this alleged misconduct and seeks appropriate remedies for the financial losses incurred as a result.

The lawsuit states that X Corp. has implemented measures to address the substantial strain on its servers caused by highly aggressive data scrapers. As a result, X Corp. has imposed restrictions on the number of tweets that each user can view per day. Additionally, access to tweets has been limited for users who are not signed in to a registered Twitter account. These actions have been taken in response to the significant demands placed on X Corp.’s infrastructure and aim to mitigate the impact of such data-scraping activities.

This particular case may encounter legal challenges, given the ruling made by the US Ninth Circuit of Appeals in the previous year. The court determined that scraping publicly accessible data does not constitute a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which is often utilized in lawsuits related to data scraping. Conversely, in 2020, the Fifth Circuit of Appeals ruled that data scraping could potentially be viewed as unjust enrichment, aligning with the stance that X Corp. appears to be taking in this lawsuit. The outcome of this case may be influenced by these varying legal perspectives on data scraping.

Elon Musk’s X Corp. Files Lawsuit Against Unidentified Entities for Unauthorized Data Scraping on Twitter

Since assuming control of Twitter, Elon Musk has implemented several modifications that he contends are necessary to prevent AI companies from accessing and utilizing Twitter’s data to train their extensive language models. Recently, Twitter introduced temporary restrictions on the number of posts users can read, to address these concerns.

Additionally, Twitter issued a warning to Microsoft, threatening legal action over allegations that it unlawfully employed Twitter data for training purposes in April. These measures and responses reflect Musk’s ongoing efforts to safeguard Twitter’s data from unauthorized usage by external entities, particularly in the realm of AI development.

In its lawsuit, X Corp. argues that data scraping companies exploit the innovation of companies like itself, leading to harm and compromising user data. X Corp. asserts that the defendants’ actions have caused significant damage, and as a result, Twitter is now seeking $1 million in damages to compensate for the impact caused by these actions.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply